2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7

Started May 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
Iskender
Senior MemberPosts: 1,313
Like?
Re: 2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7
In reply to grumpyolderman, May 24, 2013

grumpyolderman wrote:

The sigmas are really big, the pancake lest you slip you camera in a )large..) pocket, so it is really handy, and second hand should be no problem at all.

JL

The Sigmas are *not* "really big". They're very small lenses, they're just not tiny. The 20mm is admirably small but it's no reason to throw away any sense of proportion.

As an example, I carry the 19mm with the lens hood on most of the time. It fits in large jacket pockets and bags - without reversing the hood. I use a Rally 2 bag for my Pen, and it fits inside the shortest dimension - meaning camera + lens + hood equals the height of your average SLR. The 30mm is even smaller, indeed it's flatter than even the first Olympus kit lens.

There are situations when the absolutely smallest lens is needed, but I think the differences between the lenses is small here. My P1 won't go in small pockets even as body only.

To the OP: I believe the greatest difference here is the low light ability. The 20/1.7 collects over double the light of the other lenses. If you foresee shooting in bad light (e.g. bars) then it will be the better option. If you plan on shooting outdoors and in well-lit indoors the Sigmas will give you two lenses for the price of one.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow