Continuing D600 vs D7100 thread......... FX cheaper than DX ?

Started May 16, 2013 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
d3xmeister
Senior MemberPosts: 1,420
Like?
Continuing D600 vs D7100 thread......... FX cheaper than DX ?
May 16, 2013

Because the D600 vs D7100 thread reached its limit, let's continue the discussion here.

Some folks are arguing FX is cheaper than DX, because FX can afford to use slower lenses and in some cases less sharp lenses.

So far we only saw some lame examples, for example comparison of the pro Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 with old second hand Tamrons or Sigmas.

I argued that to make a fair comparison we should compare lenses form the same cathegory, with same features, same build quality, same AF speed, same quality glass (coatings) .

So we still wait for the FX is cheaper argument to be proved, so we can all go buy a cheaper FX system than DX.

Nikon D600 Nikon D7100
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
No.New
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow