why not f/1.2 by Sony?

Started May 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
TiagoReil
Senior MemberPosts: 1,505Gear list
Like?
Re: why not f/1.2 by Sony?
In reply to S3ZAi, May 14, 2013

S3ZAi wrote:

davect01 wrote:

Ya, while there are those like you who would buy a $1500, (judging by the cost of the other specialty EMount lenses), 1.2 lens, most would not.

-- hide signature --

Novice photobug, proud NEX-F3 owner
http://davesnex-3photos.blogspot.com/

How can you be so sure about this? Perhaps people coming from 'down below', from p&s wouldn't. Indeed, I have 2 friends who both bought a nex 5n with kit lens and never needed a second lens.

But what about the people that are looking at nex from 'above', for example pro's who are using an ff camera in their studio, but still would like to have a fast, smaller camera as a walk around setup. I remember Steve Huff being very very enthousiastic about the rx100 first and then the rx1: I'm sure he wouldnt use the rx100 for his studio work. Perhaps he would use the rx1, but I won't speak for him or others. I think the rx1 is mostly for serious photographers who want something to walk around with. Or people with a whole lot of money.

Anyway, if you are a pro and you can choose between a nikon d800 with a 85mm 1.2 lens and a nex with a 50mm 1.2 lens, I'm sure they would opt for the nex set. Not as their main camera, but as a backup/reserve setup. Or a walkaround setup.

Why do we always think from down below or from our own limited perspective? I'm sure if, somehow, sony would make a very expensive, but also an outstanding fast lens, which would be bigger than average, but still not as big as a fast ff lens, it would sell like cookies to many pros.

Again, I think the problem is that you dont understand that the nex line is not a pro line. IT is a consumer line. So sony provides consumer lenses. Not pro lenses. No matter how you try to see it, no matter how you put an hypothetical case of an hypothetical photographer that wants a nex with an hypothetical 1.2 lens, it is still not sonys customer.

That person can get a nice leica por 7k, and a nice 1.2 lens. An expensive leica one, or even a voiglander one for 1.4k. Or you can get that for the nex. It will be huge, it wont have stabilization nor autofocus, and it will cost you some money. And wont be supported by sony. If it works great, if not, that is not the manufacturer problem.

If you need a pro body with pro lenses, get a pro body with pro lenses. You dong get a Ford and complain that it doesnt drive as a Mercedez, right? Cause that would be silly, right? Why do the same in this case?

 TiagoReil's gear list:TiagoReil's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony 85mm F2.8 SAM Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
@OPNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow