OM-D E-M5 vs E-5 (build quality)

Started May 13, 2013 | Discussions thread
rovingtim
Veteran MemberPosts: 8,005
Like?
good processing
In reply to philosomatographer, May 14, 2013

This suggests you have very good processing techniques. Either that, or this lab's other customers don't know what they are doing. (assuming the lab is not just blowing sunshine up the *** of a customer)

Just after the E3 was released, Getty did their own propriety in-house tests of the E3. The focus of their tests was to determine RAW file quality compared to other cameras. Their conclusion was the resolution was acceptable (the E5 improves this) but the files tended to be weak compared to other cameras in terms of colour depth and contrast (similar sensor tech as the E5). They followed that by saying acceptable files could be created in post.

So, while I'm sure your lab means well, it is possible Getty knows more about files.

Unless proven otherwise, I'll go with you are exceptionally good at processing your files.

(PS -- to my knowledge, Getty didn't test the E5)

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Hmm.New
Yup!New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow