(100 - 400) or (70-200 2.8 + 300 4L+ 1.4x III/ 2x III) for wildlife photography

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
R2D2
Forum ProPosts: 13,888Gear list
Like?
Re: (100 - 400) or (70-200 2.8 + 300 4L+ 1.4x III/ 2x III) for wildlife photography
In reply to Kevin Jorgensen, 11 months ago

Kevin Jorgensen wrote:

I'd like to see you go from 300 to 400 in less than 2 seconds!

LOL, that moon isn't going very far in two seconds!

You read a lot of crap about the 100-400 but its usually by people who don't own one.

I own both primes and shoot with the 1-4 on a regular basis (a great copy BTW), so what I've posted is not CRAP.

The zoom is a Very fun lens (still on my own short list), but the primes are simply sharper, faster, and better focusing.  I almost always prefer the greater capabilities vs the convenience (for what I shoot).

R2

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries

 R2D2's gear list:R2D2's gear list
Canon EOS 650D Canon EOS 70D
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow