14-24 vs 16-35

Started May 5, 2013 | Discussions thread
kormendi_adam
Contributing MemberPosts: 872Gear list
Like?
Re: 14-24 vs 16-35
In reply to razor123, May 9, 2013

I've had the 16-35 for over a year now. You won't notice how 'bad' it is at 35mm if you use the lens as normal people do - meaning that you take a picture with good composition and show it to other people. If you shoot brick walls or charts and analyze it in a dark room for yourself, you might notice that it does not excel at 35mm.

But unfortunately there are no brick walls around here, so I have to limit myself to real subjects.

By the way, I love the useful focal length and VR is great. Shoot directly into the sun and hardly any flare. I would never trade this lens for a 14-24. Ever.

 kormendi_adam's gear list:kormendi_adam's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow