Primes vs Zooms

Started May 8, 2013 | Discussions thread
Mssimo
Contributing MemberPosts: 978Gear list
Like?
Re: Ok, you win...
In reply to paulski66, May 9, 2013

paulski66 wrote:

Stacey_K wrote:

Mssimo wrote:

Primes are much better.

That simply just isn't always the case.

Zooms are slow, big, only shart in the center, have a ton of CA and cost more money.

NC on that one.

If you like to compare a $2000 zoom with a 50mm f1.8...well the 50mm prime still wins.

You pick the absolute cheapest and easiest to make prime to compare with.

Lets try again with a 24mm lens. The 24 F2.8 is pretty much a dog. Soft edges and CA goes up as you stop it down. The only other prime is fast but the edges are soft until f5.6 and it's also almost $2000. For $1200 you can get the 16-35 F4 zoom, you get VR and "drum roll please" you also get a 16mm + a 35mm lens thrown in for free!

-- hide signature --

Stacey

Zooms are better. Zooms are definitely better...

Super zooms like the 28-300 must be much better then.

-- hide signature --
 Mssimo's gear list:Mssimo's gear list
Nikon D810 Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM | A Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 DG OS HSM +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow