D600 vs d7100

Started Apr 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
ultimitsu
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,788
Like?
Re: Try again
In reply to noirdesir, May 5, 2013

noirdesir wrote:

ultimitsu wrote:

noirdesir wrote:

ultimitsu wrote:

i. you ignore the existence of slow FF lenses and they they exist in vast quantity

I'll only repeat my original statement, I think it is clear enough and stands for itself.

And that is the point, to cover any set of focal lengths, you will have almost universally pay more for a FX set than a DX set.

And it is dead wrong. to cover 24-120 it is certainly much cheaper to buy FF lenses than APS-C.

APS-C only outperforms FF in a very specific circumstances:

  • pixel density is higher on the APS-C and
  • the subject does not fill the DX crop of the FF camera and
  • you are reach limited by the lens

This is what I would call "peculiar boundary conditions".

To cover any set of focal lengths, you will have to almost universally pay more for a FX set than a DX set.

After all that had been discussed you still insist on comparing much slower DX lens against much faster FX lens. that is just non-sensical

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow