14-24 vs 16-35

Started May 5, 2013 | Discussions thread
fft81
Contributing MemberPosts: 896
Like?
Re: 14-24 vs 16-35
In reply to razor123, May 5, 2013

razor123 wrote:

I'm about to buy one of the above Nikkor lenses. Both seem excellent. Most of my photography is travel so I like the reach of the 16-35 and the VR. 14-24 seems like it will be a bit bulky to lug around. On the other hand, the 14-24 seems to be superior optically with less distortion. So I have to weigh between portability and optical quality. The difference in cost is not a factor in my decision. Which would you choose?

I use 14-24, but no one can tell you what is the right choice for you. If for you 14-24 is too heavy and it ends up staying home, what good is it? As far as i know the 14-24 is the reason why there exist nikon to cannon adapters. Fourteen to 24 is so good that cannon shooters buy it to use in fully manual mode on their cannon bodies.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow