Do I really need prime portrait lens?

Started May 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,765Gear list
Re: Do I really need prime portrait lens?
In reply to Tepacca, May 2, 2013

Tepacca wrote:

I have Nikon 70-200mm f4 VR
Will primes like Nikon 105mm DC or Nikon 85mm 1.4 produce a much better results for portraits? I do not think these would be sharper but will bokeh be that different to justify buyung a new lens?


As the others have said only you can answer the question on what you need since it will be your money you send to address this.

That said, I wold find an f/4 lens to be too slow for my only portrait option.  I have a 70-200 f/2-8 which is my main portrait lens and an 85mm f/1.8 as well.  Which one I use depends on what my goals are.  For me, I find 100-200mm range at f/2.8 to most often give me the look I am after.  Most of the time I go to 200mm since that gives me better subject isolation.  Consider a 1.8g lens as they are not very expensive and so you risk less if you end up not using it as much.

-- hide signature --

See my plan (in my profile) for what I shoot with. See my gallery for images I find amusing.

 Bjorn_L's gear list:Bjorn_L's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX30 IS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Nikon D700 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 Nikon D750 +19 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow