GH3 - Who says that m43 is not good for sports !!!

Started Apr 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
ultimitsu
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,442
Like?
Re: I do.
In reply to Martin.au, May 1, 2013

Mjankor wrote:

***Shrug***

Crap photo, yeah, but I don't really want photos of LWDs.

First of all, As illy pointed out, DOf is much much deeper and it is nowhere near as stressing on the AF.

Secondly, despite the deep DOF,  your image is OOF, looking at at larger size, the ground within focus plain is very sharp while the face of the dog is nowhere near as sharp.

And of course, let's not forget:

Grey Hound Racing

Very good images, but again DOF is much thicker.

Why are you even here?

To correct some incorrect assertions.

I'm pretty sure you don't actually know what the focussing capabilities of M4/3s  actually are.

I know what they are - they are good - much better than what they were 3 years ago, but to say they are now as good as SLR for tacking, you would have to be kidding yourself.

If you want shoot an image matching my shot to prove the point, you'll need to shoot it at 160mm F3.2.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow