About OSS degrading image quality

Started Apr 29, 2013 | Questions thread
Section10
Contributing MemberPosts: 746Gear list
Like?
Re: About OSS degrading image quality
In reply to EinsteinsGhost, Apr 30, 2013

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Section10 wrote:

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Section10 wrote:

Sony should just come with a disclaimer: OSS has been known to offend skilled photographers and force them to defend their shooting competence.

It would take the truly incompetent to be unaware that Sony is offering OSS on its NEX-series, whereas this thread isn't about Sony.

unaware? Why would Sony put a disclaimer up on a product they're not offering? 

Sony isn't offering OSS? It is Zeiss argument.

Sony has OSS, Zeiss does not. I don't think either one of us claimed the opposite, somehow this got lost. The original joke in purple text is about the claims some are making and defending, its not claiming Sony doesn't have OSS.

So the consensus for some people is that OSS, which Sony presumably spent thousands/millions of dollars on to design and ENHANCE photo quality............degrades quality.

OSS is a rescue, not a photo quality enhancement, tool. It is basically an alternative to tripod but if you had the option between using a tripod versus OSS, why would you pick the latter? Ideally, it is best unused.

You're telling me if you're walking, on a boat, can't keep a steady hand or in any other position of needing a slower shot that OSS will not improve the quality of the photo compared to a lens that does not have any stabilisation? It's non-sensical to compare it to a tripod...most photography doesn't occur on a tripod. Yes, you can turn OSS off while on a tripod, but the photos you see are claimed to have been a blurred version while OSS on, we're saying this is a slim chance and not a necessity to turn off, I've yet to have a single shot blurred on a tripod with OSS on. Its possible yes, but incredibly exaggerated by people who bought $1500 lens w/o OSS.

There's a time and place for each feature on a camera, posting pictures of when NOT to use them does not aid your point, just makes you look silly.

The time and place for OSS, or any stabilization, is almost never the ideal occasion. The shutter speed being too slow, despite a relatively higher ISO.

People don't want to use a higher ISO, they want a lower one and if OSS can allow that then how is it 'degrading' quality while simultaneously improving it?

 Section10's gear list:Section10's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Sony Alpha 7 II Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony RX100 Sony Alpha NEX-5 +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow