"Equivalence" demonstrated: Canon 5D and Panasonic GX1

Started Apr 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 23,228
Like?
How did I say it?
In reply to pidera, Apr 29, 2013

pidera wrote:

Yes I had to read that paragrph twice and decided it was best to ignore it

Note (as I am still typing) : in the lost post I wrote something like this : Equivalency is at it's best when used in it's most simple form, ignoring things like read noise, bellows factors, t-stops and stuff like that. If all all connexions in the brain are right, one should experience some kind of insight, not yet mudded by other details. By trying to 'prove' too much hower (like the superiority of one system over another), one often ends up 'proving' nothing at all.

I think it was something like this:

http://www.josephjamesphotography.com/equivalence/index.htm#quick

  • Equivalence makes no claims whatsoever about which system is superior to another system, especially given that there are so many aspects about systems that Equivalence does not address.
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow