SURVEY - Do FT / mFT users know the difference from "full frame"? Replies wanted!!

Started Apr 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
ultimitsu
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,860
Like?
Re: SURVEY - Do FT / mFT users know the difference from "full frame"? Replies wanted!!
In reply to JosephScha, Apr 27, 2013

JosephScha wrote:

Buddy, you are the very type of people digimatt was referring to -  you have no clue.

What I don't get is why you and many others care about total light instead of light per unit area.

See? You have no clue.

FF cameras have larger sensor sights, I claim THAT is why they have better dynamic range: because they get more light per sensor element.

Which of the following camera has more DR?

36mp D800 or 16mp D4?

16mp D7000 or 12mp D300s?

24mp D600 or 12mp D3s?

16mp OMD or 12mp GF3?

But what REALLY bothers me about saying f/2.8 on mFT is "equivalent" to f/5.6 on FF is that is misleads too many people who somehow think this talks about exposure.

It is about exposure, and it is not misleading.

I think the more important point is that at the same ISO,

It appears that you do not understand what ISO is all about.

and the same shutter speed, f/2.8 on mFT gives the same exposure as f/2.8 on any other sized sensor.

It appears you do not understand what exposure is all about either.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Yes.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow