Which is more economical on inks? Epson/Canon

Started Apr 20, 2013 | Discussions thread
Sal Baker
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,684Gear list
Like?
Re: Which is more economical on inks? Epson/Canon
In reply to bravozulu, Apr 23, 2013

bravozulu wrote:

I'm not real quick with model numbers. But considering that Epson is cheaper on ink, I might be better off getting that better model  - the 2800 or 3000. If they came standard with multiple blacks and the output comes close to samples I saw at the Canon demo, then I can afford the $800 for th machine.

I wouldn't trust used equipment. This will all have to wait until I upgrade my computer to the new iMac.

Thanks for the tutorial.

If you're going to spend $800 you should certainly look at the 3880.  Until the end of the month B&H has it for $879 w/free shipping.  At the the rate you print the original inks will probably last 2 or 3 years.

Much of the overall cost of ink in Epson printers is the amount wasted cleaning head clogs.  The 3880 is famous for not clogging.  Mine hasn't had a clog in 3 years, even with long time spans between printing sessions.  Print quality is stellar, and the printer isn't much bigger than a 13-inch printer.

Sal

 Sal Baker's gear list:Sal Baker's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 350D Fujifilm X-E2 Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow