Thom Hogan's assessment of a D400

Started Apr 8, 2013 | Discussions thread
jfriend00
Forum ProPosts: 11,116
Like?
Re: Will you buy if Nikon went crazy high ISO & not MP?
In reply to whoosh1, Apr 23, 2013

whoosh1 wrote:

So let's assume the D400 comes with say 12 MP but say up to 51200 ISO and very fast FPS (may be more likely 25600) - would there be more demand for it than for another D7100 like camera? I don't think Nikon will go that direction - but just think of the possibilities for wildlife or sports (both areas users may want pro DX camera) - you could get away with a reduced need for a fast telephoto like a 200-400 VR and make do with an 80-400 AF-S. Of course the other part of the pro DX market - the "crop away to glory" market will be not satisfied.

Are you working under some assumption that a 12MP sensor would have less noise than a 24MP sensor when the output of the two is viewed at the same size?  That doesn't seem to be true these days with Nikon's full coverage microlenses and other pixel tech.

A 12MP sensor would obviously have the ability to process more fps (but the mirror would have to be able to keep up - if there is a mirror).

I'd be extremely surprised if Nikon ever made another dSLR that was 12MP.  They seem to be showing that everything is at least 16MP and, except for the D4, everything else is at least 24MP.

FYI, aperture on a lens isn't only for keeping the ISO down.  In my soccer shooting, I always shoot my 200-400 wide open at f/4 to help with subject isolation vs. the background.

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow