Comparing OM-D/prime with X100S

Started Apr 18, 2013 | Discussions thread
astone
Regular MemberPosts: 391Gear list
Like?
Re: for what its worth...
In reply to hellocrowley, Apr 19, 2013

hellocrowley wrote:

If you want to find out whether X100s ISO is inflated, this test cannot be conclusive:

1. OMD could be inflating ISO too. I'd argue that since CaNikon cameras are most popular, they're  better candidates as a reference point.

2. ISO inflation isn't linear. Even if ISO200 is not inflated, ISO1600 might be.

Look.  All I’m trying to do is just for myself and share results with you.  I’m not trying to prove anything. Just to get some sense for myself while using both my cameras back and forth, back and forth again somewhere outside far away from home with no capability and time checking anything. Are they equal? Are they close to each other? The results will follow next for your judgments.

thanks so much of being patient with me.

Alexander

-- hide signature --

ABS

 astone's gear list:astone's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Olympus E-M1 Sony a6000 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow