The (in)significance of resolution

Started Apr 15, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,954Gear list
Re: The (in)significance of resolution
In reply to rattymouse, Apr 17, 2013

rattymouse wrote:

DMillier wrote:

Don't know, there could be any number of reasons that had nothing to do with the intrinsic resolution of the media.

No, it was the resolution difference.  Have you ever seen a medium format print?  It is completely different from a 35mm print.  Not even close to the same.

-- hide signature --

9 years of Fujifilm camera usage, ended by rampant fanboyism.

Not only have I seen both, but I used to print both, in BW and Colour. The most impressive thing about a MF colour print was the fantastic colour. It's still better than digital in that respect, I think.

But, when it comes to digital...

I photographed one wedding with two cameras, an Olympus E-3 (10-mp) and a Canon 1DS2 (16mp).

I printed a lot in A3.

I could not tell which was which unless I looked up the Jpegs..

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Canon EOS-1D Mark IV +25 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow