Does M4/3 or DSLR produce higher quality photo's

Started Apr 13, 2013 | Discussions thread
Mahmoud Mousef
Senior MemberPosts: 2,064
Like?
Re: OMD viewfinder better than optical for low light?
In reply to Ulric, Apr 16, 2013

Ulric wrote:

I agree with this. I've used cameras with OVF since the 70s and the E-M5, which is considered to have a good EVF, since last year and the EVF is superior in every way except in very low light.

Yes. And fast action, in my opinion.

I love the good things electronic viewfinders bring (displaying anything an LCD can) and I think that having one is a far more natural experience to what many are used to coming from regular digital cameras and phones.

I think a lot of the technical challenges will be overcome too, and I look forward to the day I can buy an EVF camera with OVF-like performance in the weak areas that need work today. It blows my mind to think where things will be in 10 years because I remember the last 10 years of digital development pretty well, and the progress is fantastic when you look back.

Until then I'll use both types of camera for different reasons.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow