Panasonic GH3 review published

Started Apr 15, 2013 | Discussions thread
Richard Butler
dpreview AdminPosts: 1,964
Like?
Re: Panasonic GH3 review
In reply to ajamils1, Apr 15, 2013

ajamils1 wrote:

About time!! Good review but there are couple of things that I did not understand when comparing with OM-D review.

- Both have same score for RAW files and OM-D has little better score in JPEG but it has significantly better score in low light/high iso?

- How come OM-D focus and metering better than GH3?

Thanks

The low light/high iso element of image quality is considered separately (if it was also included in the JPEG score, it would essentially be double-counted) and that's really the area (in JPEG) where the E-M5 stands apart from the GH3.

The focus of the two cameras is similarly good but the GH3 has the tendency towards underexposure that we've seen before in Panasonics. Not to a terrible degree, but enough for it to be marked down a touch.

Richard - dpreview.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow