Gray cards : the 12% - 18% controversy

Started Apr 13, 2013 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Contributing MemberPosts: 764Gear list
Re: Gray cards : the 12% - 18% controversy
In reply to cquarksnow, Apr 14, 2013

One problem with using a grey card is that it doesn't compensate for the direction of the light.

If you are in a side lit situation and hold up a card facing your lens and take a reading off that, any 3 dimensional object like a face will have the lit side overexposed.

If you try and compensate for that and hold the card facing the light and take your reading, shaded parts of the image will be underexposed.

People often take readings off the back of their hands, white skin being around 18% reflectance, and then turn their hands towards or away from the light to see how their exposure will change.

Incident meters are often supplied with a hemispherical bulb over the light cell to try and integrate the illumination over a three dimensional object.

I used a Sekonic Studio Incident light meter for many years, and you could turn the bulb towards the light or away from the light to see how your exposure would change depending on what part of the object was most important to you.  i still have it and use it occasionally, and I marvel at how photographically pleasing my results are using it.

 jande9's gear list:jande9's gear list
Sigma DP1s Sigma DP2 Merrill Pentax K100D Sony Alpha NEX-7
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow