Return of Interesting article on DxO about 5D III and D800...

Started Apr 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
John Sheehy
Forum ProPosts: 17,287
Re: not res
In reply to The Davinator, Apr 12, 2013

Dave Luttmann wrote:

John Sheehy wrote:

Mako2011 wrote:

The two types of "resolution" you're speaking of...are are more related to the concept of sharpness and not resolution.

Nonsense.  Did becoming a moderator give you a license to alter reality?

There are very few people more aware of the difference between resolution and sharpness (or acuity) than I.  I rail about the difference all the time.  I did not conflate them in my post.  It is all your doing.

then instead of railing about it you should learn the difference.  Currently, you are wrong and he is correct. You are talking about acutance...not rez

Nonsense.  What is wrong with you two?

I never confuse resolution and acutance, or resolution and sharpness; at least in the last several years I haven't.  Maybe you guys need some remedial reading lessons?

My original post clearly said two things:

  1. Resolution can be measured relative to the frame/sensor size, or in absolute terms in the form of resolution per mm.
  2. Monolithic resolution measurements are misleading, especially with simple arrays of photosites.

I really don't you know where you come up with the idea that I confuse resolution with sharpness or acutance.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow