Mirrorless- Continuing to Under Perform

Started Apr 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
Mike CH
Senior MemberPosts: 2,919Gear list
Like?
Re: Why should MFT lenses be cheaper than FF lenses? Smaller, yes...
In reply to EinsteinsGhost, Apr 12, 2013

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Biggs23 wrote:

Which is well and good but the Olympus 300mm f/2.8 is $7k! Hardly seems viable if the argument is 'hell of a lot less expensive'.

-- hide signature --

Any opinions I express are my own and do not represent DPReview.

But, it is a 600mm equivalent lens on MFT, with a f/2.8 aperture for speed.

At two thirds the price of the Canon 500/4 - not bad at all.

One sixth more expensive than the Canon 300/2.8.

So building the same FL/aperture lens in MFT is actually more expensive (might also be due to the scale of economies), but then the crop factor kicks in and gives you something which looks very attractive, numbers wise at least.

Regards, Mike

-- hide signature --

Wait and see...

 Mike CH's gear list:Mike CH's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +8 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
YeahNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow