New Canon Rebel closing the gap on M4/3s

Started Mar 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
amalric
Forum ProPosts: 10,820
Like?
Re: A brave and interesting post.
In reply to CollBaxter, Apr 11, 2013

CollBaxter wrote:

amalric wrote:

tgutgu wrote:

CollBaxter wrote:

Actually a lot of people are thinking that at the moment. As an Olympus user who has not bought into m4/3 for a lot of reasons  the release of the D100 is very interesting. Its also interesting  to people outside this forum and a few others  who want to go smaller but not tiny and retain the full functionality of a fully fledged DSLR system. Some users prefer a camera with a bit of meat behind it. The OMD is a great camera but it's not cheap and if you are such a user (Who likes a bit of feel to the camera)  by the time you have dressed it up to go out and get a job ( Added  grip and battery) it actually becomes an  expensive camera. (My personal felling)

And before there are comparisons of weight etc , etc  getting dug up there are a few reasons for my thoughts.  The D100 is the first real  small DSLR camera from the big boys with full DSLR systems and is now an alternative to people who want to go smaller and still have the backup of a fully fledged professional system.

Your conclusion is incorrect. The camera body - unless it is as big as a EOS 1D series - isn't by far the main thing, which makes your photographic equipment small. It is the lenses! The EF and EF-S lenses are simply too big to convince a lot of people, who want a smaller camera system.

The selection of m4/3 lenses is already big enough to make 90% of photographers happy. Some special niches aren't yet covered, like tilt&shift lenses, extreme telephoto lenses, and some macro specialities, but that's it. So, for many, m4/3 is already full-fledged.

Therefore, I don't think that the EOS 100D is a major thread to m4/3. It rather shows that Canon is not willing to create something innovative and new, and shows that now is the time to switch, if you want to get small.

I subscribe entirely, there is no way that the mirrorbox will come back with a vengeance. It is simply fighting a rearward battle.

Err Am if one looks at sales its still there and at this point does not need  a come back,  later maybe but not currently.

If people want big cameras with OVF there is plenty to choose from yet, but m4/3 is not about being small only. It is about going fully digital and having a competitive IQ with much bigger cameras.

Why the word competitive should it not be better or equal. As to fully digital you are referring to the viewfinder. Have you ever used a camera with a good optical viewfinder. WYSWYG. What you see is what you get and can make adjustments accordingly not what the camera presents to you or wht it thinks it should present to you.

Therefore it is forging ahead regardless. Live bulb/time is a good example of what no dSLR will be able to do

Why not . Correct me if I am wrong Am but if you flip the mirror up and lock it up the camera  (DSLR) can act exactly like a mirror less using the rear lCD. No.

Am.

-- hide signature --

I just complained about the OP trolling. You are doing no different, but you are such a lamer and indifferent photographer, that you are better be left ignored.

Am.

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow