Sensor Size & Versatility

Started Apr 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
pixelless
Contributing MemberPosts: 612
Like?
Re: For me...
In reply to EinsteinsGhost, Apr 4, 2013

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

pixelless wrote:

Saying that someone can get the same PoV with a 200mm on a Nex as a FF with a 300mm doesn´t make much sense to me. You could use a 200mm on a FF body, crop to 300mm and still have a better image.

And those "BIF" shots... well I´m sorry, but if you told me they came from an Iphone I wouldn´t argue.

And you'd be perfectly like those iPhone camera users who can't tell the difference.

BTW, on FoV issue, your argument would be more valid if it were about the advantage of FF: wider angles, than telephoto reach, where smaller sensors are more effective, even before cropping is considered.

I really can´t... but I can see a huge difference from that to a shot taken with a FF and decent glass. But hey, if you think that´s closer to FF IQ than to Iphone IQ, that´s great (for you)!

Again, if you think your Nex produces better than FF IQ at longer focal lenghts, all the power to you. You will save a lot of cash. And I don´t think you got my point, but that´s ok too.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
jeezNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow