New 100-400 in a few months?

Started Mar 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,034Gear list
Re: "nothing wrong"
In reply to joger, Apr 3, 2013

joger wrote:

don't mention the type II tele lenses here - you might get serious bashing for that

It's not your mentioning of your God-lenses that gets you bashed. You can lick them as far as I'm concerned and you can construct altars in you house and sacrifice mice to them, if that makes you happy.

It's your constant denigration of perfectly good lenses with stellar performance because you didn't happen to choose them. For a novice reading this rubbish, it's likely to put him off sensible purchases. You are talking about differences measured by people whose life is measurement, differences which are difficult to see in results, and even if present really contribute little to the merit of a photograph.

An awful lot of the merit of photography has to do with light and lighting. Have you heard of that?

Your measurement gurus never talk about it because it can't be measured, but it sure as hell can be seen..

-- hide signature --

Níor bhris focal maith fiacail riamh (Irish Gaelic)
A good word never broke a tooth.

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Canon EOS-1D Mark IV +25 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow