Missing the 70-200 f2.8 (warning, long post)

Started Apr 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Regular MemberPosts: 476
Re: Missing the 70-200 f2.8 (warning, long post)
In reply to karl722, Apr 3, 2013

I would go with option 2, a AF adapter and A mount lens.

Really depends what you shoot. Do you just need reach, or also AF?

I have a 85 f1.4 and 200 f2.8 manual lenses. The lack of AF would make sports more difficult to shoot, but probably not impossible. For pure reach, they work pretty well. You can also find manual 80-200 f2.8 lenses pretty easily.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow