Just how crappy is the 16-50 kit lens? Test vs 17mm prime & 11-16 Tokina

Started Mar 31, 2013 | Discussions thread
temama
Regular MemberPosts: 362
Like?
Re: E16-50 is better lens.
In reply to captura, Apr 3, 2013

captura wrote:

temama wrote:

captura wrote:

However, the OP's original question was, "Just how crappy is the 16-50 kit lens?"

At about than about 20mm and wider, the 16-50 is worse than the 18-55. So the correct answer is;  Very Crappy.

BS.

My E16-50 is optically better lens than my E18-55kit. At all focal lengths. Though, E18-55 isn't bad as cheap kit lens.

Which model NEX do you have? If you have a 5R or 6, did you update the lens firmware, enable PDAF and turn on lens correction for your 18-55?  If you didn't then you have no basis for comparison. ie: your comparison would be invalid. Following this procedure, my 18-55 was transformed into a very much better lens.

My girlfriend uses my E18-55 kit with older NEX-5 model. So no need for new firmware. But any firmware can't improve microcontrast and sharpness of lens. And 18-55 is worse here than E16-50. E16-50 really has snappy microcontrast and makes sharper images.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow