A few words on Equivalence and comparing systems

Started Apr 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 23,785
Like?
Re: Yikes! : )
In reply to Anders W, Apr 2, 2013

Anders W wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

Mike Ronesia wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

Portola wrote:

Dear Mr. Bustard,

Your posts are always of interest and this one is interesting too, but isn't the 12-35 f/2.8 equivalent to a 24-70 f/5.6 rather than a 70-200?

Oh dear -- how embarrassing is that?  Well, it could be worse, I suppose -- you could have pointed out my zipper was down when I wasn't wearing underwear. 

LOL, that was the first thing I saw and stopped reading. Maybe you can get a Mod to correct the original post for you.

I was thinking that, but then it seems such a shame to erase a blunder of that magnitude, don't you think? 

Mark James
A.K.A. Mike Ronesia

24-70 / 5.6

A.K.A. 70-200 / 5.6

Are you sure about that Joe? What I thought you actually meant to say is that a 12-35/2.8 on MFT is equivalent to a 70-200/16 on MFE.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow