IS and image quality

Started Mar 27, 2013 | Questions thread
William Woodruff
Regular MemberPosts: 341Gear list
Like?
Re: IS and image quality
In reply to bhollis, Mar 30, 2013

I suspect you are right.  Given the apparent difficulty of getting edge-to-edge sharpness in shorter lenses anyway, it seems that adding an IS group would be more of a problem there.  That, combined with less need for IS at shorter focal lengths probably limits its utility in that area.  I suspect (as you pointed out) that is the reason Canon went non-IS on the 24-70/2.8 II; it will be interesting to see how that works out for them.  It works out so well on my 17-55, it is hard to image giving it up in that range.  If I had Keith's problem (having to deal with a new 5D3), I'd have to take a long hard look at the Tamron.

-- hide signature --

WLW

 William Woodruff's gear list:William Woodruff's gear list
Canon EOS M
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow