Thinking of swapping from MFT to full DSLR - Advice?

Started Mar 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Forum ProPosts: 17,994Gear list
Only two reasons to go full DSLR....
In reply to Pebbleheed, Mar 29, 2013

Pebbleheed wrote:

shallow wide angle DOF and tracking AF.

That is all.

I'm still relatively new to photography.

Then you have a long way to go before you could  possibly justify buying a FF dSLR.

I bought a Panasonic GX1 a short while back and I'm pretty happy with it. I love the small size of it while enjoying using interchangeable lenses. However there are some points that are annoying me.

The main point with the GX1 is that lenses are expensive.

Oly 40-150mm-    $99.00

Oly 17mm f/2.8   $175.00

Panny 14mm f/2.5  $200.00

Sigma 19mm and 30mm together $200.00

Legacy lenses:  about $10.00 - $75.00

I look at my friends with their Canon EOS 550D cameras as they pick up lenses for a fraction of what I pay for MFT lenses.

But there are a lot of legacy lenses (e.g. rangefinder lenses, Konica lenses, Half frame lenes, etc) they can't mount.

They can in some cases get 2 or 3 lenses for just 1 of mine and to be honest I've not noticed a difference in quality that would justify the price difference.

You are paying for the size/weight difference.

Compare the Oly 40-150mm with a FF 80-300mm zoom!

Secondly is the depth of field. To get decent bokeh

DOF and "bokeh" are two entirely different things.  Bokeh is the quality of the out of focus areas and is dependent on a lot of things including the number of aperture blades and the shape of the blades in the lens.  DOF is the depth within the image that is in an acceptable range of sharpness. Bokeh is largely independent of format size.  DOF is not.  But, for general photography, the 4/3 format has a better DOF profile than FF.

type backgrounds on my shots I have to be close up to my subjects.

No you don't, you just need a longer focal lenght.

I have to be low down on the aperture.


The DSLR cameras appear to be able to beat this in every way without having to get as close and without having to go as low on the aperture.

FF cameras have DOF that is too narrow wide open for most subjects, except wide angle shots.

I enjoy taking my GX1 out with the 14mm pancake lens on to get some street shots, but when it comes to other shots such as macro or portrait I'm feeling a little let down to be honest.

You should.

The 14mm lens is not intended for portrait or macro work.

I'm starting to wonder if it's time to trade the GX1 in and go for a 550D in it's place?

Really what you should be wondering is whether you might be better served by taking a photography class where you would learn about focal lenght and it's effect on DOF, and how camera to subject distance alone effects perspective.

Anyone else feel a little cheated on the MFT lens prices?

It depends on what lenses you buy. The micro four thinds lenes below can be had for about $700.00 all together and cover a focal range from 18mm-300mm FF eqivalent.

The fact that u 4/3 can adapt just about every lens ever made allows me to assembly a lens collection that would otherwise cost thousands of dollars for just few hundred:

I accept that the small size we enjoy has to have let downs in other areas, but I'm trying to make up my mind to see if I can live with a little bigger a camera to get more benefits of a full DSLR.

You haven't really stated any benefits you can't get with the u 4/3 format.


 tedolf's gear list:tedolf's gear list
Olympus PEN E-P5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm 1:2.8 Pancake Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 II R +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow