Amanda Knox - Double Jeopardy

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
William Carson
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,798
Like?
Re: Amanda Knox - Double Jeopardy
In reply to papillon_65, Mar 28, 2013

The reason I don't think there is a conclusive case against the two is that the things that you are saying are conclusive are, as you said,  circumstantial. A late night phone call to me means nothing. A lamp that was in a locked room that was belonging to Knox, again means nothing. You did not read the whole detailed article I sited and just lable it as 'American magazine.' Of all the things put out by media, this (article) was what cleared up the non-substanciated case against the two.

"Large traces of Knox's blood was mixed with Kerchers' blood in the bathroom"

Now, this would be conclusive if true. But was there large amounts of Knox's blood mixed with Kerchers'?  How much?

That she falsely accused another person after hours of interrogation is what happens to a confused frightened person and at best is a weakness of character. Of course it could also be part of the crime but it is not conclusive at all.

I just disagree with your certainty, thats all.
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow