I think Thom was right, again...

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Erik Magnuson Forum Pro • Posts: 12,237
Re: While digital PER SHOT is cheaper...
1

Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee wrote:

Film per good shot is much cheaper.

I had a high hit rate of good shots with film, much much higher than I have with digital as I took more care.

I'm willing to bet your standards for what makes a (technically) good shot have changed to be more demanding with digital. Many people are surprised when they scan their old film and/or examine it critically at the same level of enlargement we do routinely for digital.

-- hide signature --

Erik

 Erik Magnuson's gear list:Erik Magnuson's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 450D Sigma SD10 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Nikon D3200 +28 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BJN
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow