I think Thom was right, again...

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,034Gear list
While digital PER SHOT is cheaper...
In reply to TheEye, Mar 27, 2013

Film per good shot is much cheaper.

I had a high hit rate of good shots with film, much much higher than I have with digital as I took more care.

In a wedding I might take 120 shots with medium format. I would be disappointed if more than 5 were poor..

That's the way it was.

You kept the same camera year in year out. Money was spent on film, development etc.

You could save a lot on digital if you kept the latest cameras which are as good as you will every really NEED.

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Canon EOS-1D Mark IV +25 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow