Real life Firewire 800 vs 400

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
graybalanced
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,894
Like?
Re: Real life Firewire 800 vs 400 vs USB 2.0
In reply to Radu Tenenbaum, Mar 27, 2013

Radu Tenenbaum wrote:

I was surprised that the USB performance was that much slower than the FW400.

Yes, this has been an issue since USB 2 came out. While on the spec sheets the theoretical limits are...

USB 2 = 480 megabits/second

FireWire 400 = 400 megabits/second

...the reality is that the way FireWire is architected makes it more efficient than USB. For example, FireWire is independently controlled by its own chipset, while USB must compete with whatever other priorities the CPU is dealing with. So FireWire 400 can usually maintain higher sustained transfer rates in the real world than USB 2.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow