Exposure Basics, lesson three?

Started Mar 18, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
bobn2
bobn2 Forum Pro • Posts: 41,890
Re: Exposure Basics, lesson three?
1

RoelHendrickx wrote:

This thread is not so much a continuation, as a relativation of a previous thread that goes into the technicalities of correct exposure:´╗┐

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/51096748

While it is important to know and apply the basics of (correct) exposure´╗┐, the only thing I want to say is that the technicalities have a relative value, and emotional impact has another value.

Let me just illustrate that with two incorrectly exposed images.

´╗┐

Underexposed?

As has been pointed out, it's impossible to tell without looking at the raw file. But, you could have had more exposure. You're using 1/125, which doubtless you felt you needed with the FL you were using but it's not a fast moving subject, so maybe you could have used a slower shutter speed if you'd used a support or some IS. But then you haven't got critical sharpness on the face anyway, since you focussed on the microphone. In a way, this is a case of a capture that slightly missed it, with a rescue going on in processing, so it's relevance to the question of whether 'exposure' means the tonality of a photo given a fixed processing chain or whether it means the light density at the sensor on capture is moot.

-- hide signature --

Bob

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow