So... I finally come to a decision to go with the OM-D... Is there any big hand users out there?

Started Mar 13, 2013 | Questions thread
Jack Hogan
Senior MemberPosts: 3,626Gear list
Like?
Re: Issue 2: How to fairly compare output image IQ of two similar DSCs
In reply to Martin.au, Mar 17, 2013

Mjankor wrote:

Jack Hogan wrote:

texinwien wrote: So yeah, dunno Jack. I'm with you in a lot of ways here, and I understand where you're coming from, but you're making one or two small errors in logic that are throwing off the entire rest of your argument.

Only for people that take snippets of my posts out of their context. I've known this stuff as summarized in these two posts for years and certainly did not change my mind in the last couple of days for these two threads.

Jack

PS This phantomatic 'proof' you keep referring to was just a fictitious example connected to issue 1 (inconsistent in-camera ISOs between cameras and manufacturers), labelled as such for correctness and nothing to do with exposure, of what may happen when in-camera ISO labels are arbitrarily assigned by a a manufacturer - foolish people take them at face value at their own peril when deciding where to lay their money.

I still want an example of point 1

"1) Inconsistent in-camera ISO labelling by manufacturers."

Eg: If most cameras require ISO200, 1/200, f5, to generate a nice jpeg, find me a camera that requires ISO400, 1/200, f5 for the same scene.

The OM-D is not an example of this, as you have claimed here;

Sir, I have claimed no such thing and metering has never been part of this discussion.  As for examples of inconsistend in-camera ISO labelling you can peruse this site or any other good sources on the net for examples.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
+1New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow