Continued discussion-5D comparison

In this post:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/51039820

I am NOT going to test under such rubbish equivalence anyway, period but test as people shoot cameras in real world.

The "rubbish equivalence" comes from anytime both DOF and shutter speed need to be the same. Clearly, we seek to use whatever system we are using to get the best photo possible, and if one system can take a better photo than another using a different DOF and shutter speed, we would do so.

Next, you presented this photo:



http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/7843305573/photos/2375248/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii_3b4a0589

and said:

Yadi, yadi, yadi but that's not the way how we use cameras in real world. I am still waiting you for example to generate a test photo from EM-5 and Panny 20/1.7 against my 40/2.8 pancake with 5D3 to prove why I "must" shoot at F3.4 eq DOF and why I suffer or actually benifit from shooting at F2.8.

So, can we see a 100% crop of that red wreath on the right middle of the photo? Then I'll be happy to answer your question.