Sony 16-50 2.8 versus CZ 16-35 2.8
This is what I am thinking too, and I will always have APS-C cameras around so I think the 16 50 is probably a good buy for now, I want to get the weather sealing and upgrade the tammy. In addition will compliment it with 70 400 II or 70 200 G instead.
I am still interested in knowing from those who might have both lenses and can let me know if the 16 50 comes close to the CZ in image quality.
Thanks for all you guys getting closer to being comfortable with my decision, just scared of spending so much hard earned cash and not being satisfied.