How good or bad is the E16-50PZ?

Started Mar 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Contributing MemberPosts: 664Gear list
Re: How good or bad is the E16-50PZ?
In reply to thephased, Mar 8, 2013

Most of the complaints i've seen are about the distortion and vignetting at the wide end, but its worth noting that it only becomes a 16mm focal length after lens correction. When it first came out people did tests that showed that it was actually a 14.5mm(ish) in RAW. If you judge it on its RAW performance then you need to take that into account.

-- hide signature --

Ben Williams - UK
NEX 5N / E 18-55. E 16. UWA. Fisheye. Sigma 19. / Minolta MC 50 1.4. Tamron 90 2.5 Macro. Vivitar 100 3.5 Macro. Soligor 135 2.8 / Raynox DCR-250 / 49mm CP filter / Spare battery / LIM's flash bounce. Film canister diffuser / OPTECH wriststrap
Nikon V1 / N1 10-30. N1 30-110 / Franiec Grip.
Sony TX10.

 Herts_JoaTMoN's gear list:Herts_JoaTMoN's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-5N Nikon 1 V1 Nikon 1 Nikkor VR 30-110mm f/3.8-5.6 Sigma 19mm F2.8 EX DN Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow