Disappointed with the 55-200

Started Mar 6, 2013 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
idefixx
Forum MemberPosts: 56Gear list
Like?
Disappointed with the 55-200
Mar 6, 2013

As a current Nikon DSLR user who misses many shots because I don't feel like lugging around big bags all the time, I was (and still am) hopeful that the X Series would allow me to upgrade on IQ and "old fashioned" manual controls and build quality, downgrade on bulk but without paying Leica prices.

So far I haven't purchased any body yet since I wanted to get more visibility on how the lens road map would materialize. What I know is that I am getting an X100s very soon as my everday camera.

Besides that I want to complete a more comprehensive travel set that is portable, flexible (not too many lens changes) and covers everything from UWA to zoom. I was looking at either 2 combinations:

10 - 24, 35 and 55-200 or

14 , 18-55 and 55-200

as for the body I was going to wait what this year was going to offer in terms of XP2 / XE2.

Now having read the data sheet of the zoom lens, I am lost. 580 grams? Seriously?? Not even talking about a healthy balance btw body and lens but that's as much a Nikon 18-200 or a bit less than a Canon 24-105 lens weighs. I know we are not comparing apples with apples here and don't consider body weight, however looking at the overall weight that would go into the luggage, it does matter a lot! Not even mentioning that I'd need to be compromising on what range each lens covers (tele for me is more for occasional use). Now I might consider an alternative set excluding the zoom and going for 10-24, 35 and 56. In any case, the X series now only has the potential to become a full-fledged set if they offer a different tele zoom or a prime at 90 or 100mm...

I also get the feeling, the lens roadmap is not the best thought through set of lenses (they had the chance designing them from almost scratch). It rather has a few interesting options in it, such as rather fast primes, a what seems great mid zoom, an unusal format for the UWA zoom etc, a pancake for portability. But there are many overlaps (eg if someone has the X100s and the 2 wide zooms, you cover the 23mm 3 times). I think they missed a great opportunity to build a unique USP for their system for new users but rather focused on bringing out qualitative products (body and lens) that certainly have a lot of appeal but once locked in doesn't offer consistent solutions. This makes you buy more lenses eventually but ending up with similar weight than a normal DSLR and the inconvenience of more frequent changes - or in other words unsatisfied consumers over time (or missed new ones).

I really hope there will be an updated roadmap soon showing the 2014 lenses as well plus more visibility on pricing, specs and dates for this year. In the meantime I hope the likes of Zeiss focus on creating real competition (rather than just copying the Fuji lenses, making them a bit slower and more expensive) by filling the niche with some attractive AF options for the X mount. It'd be for the benefit of all of us...

 idefixx's gear list:idefixx's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Nikon D7100 Fujifilm X-E2 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G +15 more
Fujifilm X100S
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow