Sigma 35mm F/1.4: My Experience from recent test

Started Mar 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Doug_PS OP
Contributing MemberPosts: 532Gear list
Re: Sigma 35mm F/1.4: My Experience from recent test
In reply to MAC, Mar 3, 2013

MAC wrote:

Doug_PS wrote:

MAC wrote:

canon's 35 is fastest to focus

both have some nervous bokeh imo

the not optimal bokeh in the ops displayed situations might drive me to the 35 f2 IS - just waiting for price drop

I plan to test the 35 f2 IS on my next trip. If I do end up going with that one, I'm going to "wait it out" for a price drop too! In the meantime, I'll just plan to make due with my $149 40MM pancake for as long as I need. Not a bad compromise at all! Who knows, I may end up keeping it in the end after all of my testing is done.

I liked your samples a lot btw. Thanks for posting.

Consider though that all the 35's rather suck when it comes to Great Bokeh.

The decision may be better judged by what type of shooting you do.

If it is action people shooting, I still think the sigma 35 f1.4 will be better than the 35 f2 IS

if it is scapes and static shots, the 35 f2 IS will win

Good points Mac!  Thanks.

 Doug_PS's gear list:Doug_PS's gear list
Canon PowerShot N100 Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow