Surely AA-less is a more cost effective method and flexible method of raising resolution than MP's?

With the obvious ability now to use AA-less and its success on the D800e, surely for sports and events this is more cost effective at improving resolution and crop ability than raising MP's, while being able to retain improved high ISO and DR at all ranges?

This will also enable faster / cheaper file processing ay 16MP AA-less vs 24MP with AA??

--
.....Just from an amateur......''Sometimes it's to your advantage for people to think you're crazy.” I am only a hoobyist, I cannot and do not give expert advice, dont expect it, just take it as a suggestion to think about, but only if you wish to. We should try to not wait for life to happen, while it passes us by.