85mm f/1.8 vs longer end of 70-200mm f/2.8

Started Mar 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
unknown member
(unknown member)
Like?
Re: 85mm f/1.8 vs longer end of 70-200mm f/2.8 Humble suggestion
In reply to Varuas, Mar 2, 2013

Varuas wrote:

I feel that I would regret if I let the rebates expire without buying a lens. I only have 50mm f/1.8 for my D600 as my FX lens. I was looking to get perhaps Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 for telephoto and portraits, but could not pull the trigger... I am mostly shooting portraits, family events, etc so 50mm does fine... what I want more is the clear subject separation that a longer FL fast lens gives.

My question: given that I have 50mm f/1.8G, does it make sense to get 85mm f/1.8G for portraits, events, and occassional telephoto? I went to the zoo and found my 50mm to be sorely lacking... missed the days when I had 18-200mm with my D90.

1) 85 1.8G = 400

2) Tamron 70-300VR (as Nikon 70-300 not rebated much)= 349?

400+349 =749

Just 249 more than regular price of 85 1.8g and you get lenses for two types of shooting that you do.

Just a thought.

-- hide signature --

.....Just from an amateur......''Sometimes it's to your advantage for people to think you're crazy.” I am only a hoobyist, I cannot and do not give expert advice, dont expect it, just take it as a suggestion to think about, but only if you wish to. We should try to not wait for life to happen, while it passes us by.

 Bajerunner's gear list:Bajerunner's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon AF-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED +8 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow