Is diffraction an increasing worry? Or, what's wrong with more megapixels?

Started 4 months ago | Questions thread
YuriS
Regular MemberPosts: 228
Like?
Re: Is diffraction an increasing worry? Or, what's wrong with more megapixels?
In reply to Macx, 4 months ago

Macx wrote:

MPA1 wrote:

I prefer to go and make pictures rather than worry about physics.

No client of mine has yet rejected an image on grounds of diffraction, too many or not enough megapixels or any other such technical sideshow...!

Well, getting the exposure and focus right is physics as well. We can allow the camera to do all the calculations for us, but understanding what they are can be helpful. Framing and perspective is physics for that matter too, even if we have a much more intuitive understanding of these things.

Since you don't worry about those things, you may have missed my point, though. My argument was that it's the final image that is the interesting bit, and that we aren't as limited by diffraction as is usually postulate, simply because the practical, useful resolution of the final image mostly is much lower than what the camera sensor picks up.

Macx! I do not want to discuss your statement (is it right or not) since it is pure physic, and our goal - is a photography, not rocket science. You just need to know, that every lens has its own resolution profile. And you need to know that this resolution is depending to f-stops, with certain peak around f4.0-f8.0 (depend to lens) and go down when f--stop growth. So discussion, which diffraction impact more (of the lens itself, or pixel size, or both effects together), frankly speaking, needless...

--
Yuri Stangrit
http://natalispalette.jimdo.com/new-and-old-camera-lenses-by-yuri-stangrit/

Edited 4 months ago by YuriS
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow