Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
Detail Man
Forum ProPosts: 12,963
Like?
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?
In reply to DonSantos, 3 months ago

DonSantos wrote:

DonSantos wrote:

... its not diffucult for dpreview to use a light meter to control their lights. that way we can get accraye comparisons regardless of iso.

Regarding "accraye comparisons":

Andy Westlake wrote:

Detail Man wrote:

(1) I assume that DPReview records are kept (measured independently from model-to-model varying camera-metering readings, and measured using a separate light-meter) of the illuminance of the test target at the time of performing the individual tests.

No, they're not, as a rule. We're a camera review site, not a science lab.

(2) Can it be assumed that the amplitude-scaling of RAW image-data in versions of Camera RAW used to convert the GH2, GX1, G3 and E-M5 RAW image-files has been controlled and consistent ? All that I need to know is the ratios between the amplitude-scalings in each of these specific cases

If you're asking the question I think you are (although to be honest I'm not entirely sure what you're saying), then the answer is almost certainly no. Our RAW conversions are brightness-matched to the camera JPEGs so the comparison makes visual sense between cameras. This is Adobe's policy anyway - after all, it's what most users expect - so we don't generally have to adjust the output sliders from default positions, but occasionally we'll tweak the brightness control to get the best possible match.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/40965292

brightness match and exposure match are very different things

Gee, Don, I never would have guessed that on my own. Where have you been all my life ? My questions were in relation to sensor-level Exposure (you know, the real deal, just like "downtown") in order to assess RAW-level image-file channel-scaling applied by different cameras.

Not sure where you get "brightness" out of the above - but Westlake's reference to the "Brightness" control of Adobe ACR/LR through versions 6.x/7.x concerns a user-control that Adobe states modifies the gamma-correction constant applied to RAW-processed images. The net effect of tweaking that control is to modify the (midtone) Signal to (image) Noise Ratio of the particular DPR SCT RAW thumbnail. Thus, such tweaking results in a deviation from what would be a truly equal comparison.

Edited 3 months ago by Detail Man
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow