Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?

texinwien wrote:

I touched on incorrect information in an earlier post. Which incorrect information are you objecting to, by the way? Detailed examples would be appreciated.

EDIT: Heck, I touched on incorrect information in the very post you answered, and I quote, "it's all lies and/or inaccuracies."

I believe lies and/or inaccuracies cover 'incorrect information' reasonably well. Again, detailed examples of incorrect information that you're objecting to would still be appreciated.

EDIT THE SECOND: Regarding the credentials of the writers and 'simple fun presentations', allow me to quote exdeeeejjjjaaaaaaa, who's post I wrote this scenario in answer to:

"it is a blog for elderly gentlemen' mumbling about photography and peddling some prints"

Hm, perhaps not exactly attacking the writers' credentials or 'simple fun presentations', but I think if you allow a little artistic license, you'll see how my scenario is, indeed, somehow analagous to the totality of responses I received, no?

tex