Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?

Jim, the real problem is the OP was a ridiculous post with a hidden motive.

He claims he looked at the results posted by DxO and then asked if there really was a 1 stop difference between the EM5 and GH3. His problem? NOWHERE on DxO is there a 1 stop difference in their results, so he must have another motive for that post.

For the record. DxO rates the GH3 and E-M5 identically. Their charts for noise, DR, color, etc, are the same (the EM5 a few times is slightly better). Even when you look at their tests for ISO (which are not standard), there is NOT a 1 stop difference, and at a few ISOs they are very, close (for example EM5 ISO 200 is 107 and GH3 is 149 and ISO12800 they are almost the same).

So if he really was telling the truth about look at DxO, he has to be purposely misleading everyone with the statement, "is the E-M5 really about 1 stop behind the GH3?"

Again, it's like saying, "so, do you still beat your wife?"