Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	5
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Alumna Gorp	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	JayBratcher	4 months ago
Clarification required	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Clarification required	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Thanks, another couple of questions	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Thanks, another couple of questions	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Beautiful shot, Ron	texinwien	4 months ago
Are we really doing this AGAIN?	kenw	4 months ago	17
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	6
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	Anders W	4 months ago	13
Re: Are we really doing this AGAIN?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Thomas Kachadurian	4 months ago	6
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	4 months ago	8
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	ElginC	4 months ago	2
DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	7
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Not true.	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Re: Not true.	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	texinwien	4 months ago	3
Re: Not true.	MAubrey	4 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	rialcnis	4 months ago
Re: Not true.	RicksAstro	4 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	ElginC	4 months ago
Your lack of understanding is astounding.	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	2
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	3
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	4 months ago	4
DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	MAubrey	4 months ago
Here is your problem	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	5
Re: Here is your problem	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	3
Re: Here is your problem	jim stirling	4 months ago	4
It was a ridiculous post with another motive	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	2
I think the reaction here	Art_P	4 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	4 months ago	3
Re: Look at the DxOMark SNR (18%) Data	Detail Man	4 months ago	6
Thank you	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	4 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	MAubrey	4 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	Anders W	4 months ago	3
You keep changing your story!	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
As long as	Art_P	4 months ago	3
No	Russ Houston	4 months ago
Read and Learn	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :)	reygon	4 months ago
Re: Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :) Indeed.	SeeRoy	4 months ago
What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	noirdesir	4 months ago	5
Re: What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	jim stirling	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Pete Berry	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Is it true that Subway foot long subs are actually 11.5"!?	SirSeth	4 months ago	3
But if you compare the girth.....	Wallybipster	4 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Henry Richardson	4 months ago	2
Excellent! Should be required reading	texinwien	4 months ago	1
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Detail Man	4 months ago
Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago	1
Perhaps	Art_P	4 months ago	2
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago	1
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
ACR EV post-scaling	Pete Berry	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmmmmm ...	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	exdeejjjaaaa	4 months ago
I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	4 months ago	2
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	4 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	4 months ago
Correction	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	4 months ago
Misunderstanding	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Misunderstanding	richarddd	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RichRMA	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	LTZ470	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you - Nope	Brian Wadie	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Detail Man	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	4 months ago	4
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	3
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	bluelemmy	4 months ago	1
That is the question	Art_P	4 months ago	1
Re: That is the question	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
If the GH3 meters like the GH2	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: If the GH3 meters like the GH2	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	RicksAstro	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	3 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	texinwien	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	3 months ago
For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	4 months ago
Complain to DxO then	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	2
Re: Complain to DxO then	cptobvious	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	RicksAstro	4 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	4 months ago	3
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	3 months ago
Lighting may be different though.	Just Having Fun	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	3 months ago	1
Re: Lighting may be different though.	MAubrey	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	LTZ470	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified ...	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	zxaar	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	Anders W	3 months ago
That's what exposure comp is for...	BJN	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	3 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	104
Insensitive composition..	86
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	77
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	63
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	56
New rumour on SAR	56
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	47
e-p5 What's not to love	45
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	45
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	42
Considering switching systems	39
$2000 mft Budget	39
Lightzone is back and Open source!	35
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	33
FZ200 airshow #6: Panasonic TC, and ...	30
D7100 - A few Great Blue Heron shots from Mud ...	30
Purchasing opinion	30
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	29
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	27
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	27