Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
Ron Evers
Contributing MemberPosts: 567
Like?
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?
In reply to Alumna Gorp, 4 months ago

Alumna Gorp wrote:

Ron Evers wrote:

I am sure Oly has intentionally misrepresented the ISO for marketing. I have to set my Gossen Lunasix F light meter @ ISO 100 to match the settings of the camera @ ISO 200.

I typically shoot +.7 exposure compensation to achieve good exposure on the E-M5.

--
The wood is clear between the knots.

All camera`s will vary to some extent this is common.

Why do you think light meters are or should be calibrated to the camera body and lens used.

Am I bothered no.

The point being, my hand-held light meter results in good exposures whereas the in-body E-M5 under exposes without plus exposure compensation.  I now know that +.7 compensation is close enough & can be fine tuned in Lightroom.

--
The wood is clear between the knots.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow